Skip to main content

Chinese "India Out Campaign" failed | Maldives is in India's basket | String of pearls is failing?

Introduction

In recent years, China’s “India‑Out Campaign” in the Maldives, the strategic contest over the “String of Pearls”, and India’s response including the Double Fish Hook Strategy have become central to understanding the evolving balance of power in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR). This post examines:

  • Why the India‑Out campaign ultimately failed

  • How Maldives was never firmly in India’s basket

  • Why the String of Pearls strategy is faltering

  • What India’s strategic responses mean for the future.


1. Origin and Intent of the China‑Backed “India‑Out Campaign”

1.1 Background: 2023 Presidential Election in Maldives

Modi and Maldives president giving shake hand to each other

Mohamed Muizzu ran on a populist “India Out” platform in 2023, promising to remove Indian military and technical presence and pivot towards China. He won with 54% of the vote against the incumbent Solih’s “India‑first” policy (Observer Research Foundation, Wikipedia, Reddit, Wikipedia).

1.2 Goals and Rhetoric

The campaign argued India’s influence threatened sovereignty and pushed for closer economic and strategic ties with China, drawing parallels with former President Yameen’s earlier pro‑Beijing alignment (ISAS).

1.3 China’s Strategic Interests

China saw an opening to expand its investment footprint via Belt & Road projects—especially infrastructure like the Sinamalé Bridge and loans tied to strategic influence (Wikipedia).


2. India‑Out Campaign: Why It Failed

2.1 Misinformation and Backlash

India labelled the campaign as “based on misinformation and false propaganda,” especially around rumors of permanent troop deployments. Public opinion in Maldives remained skeptical (Reddit).

2.2 Economic Reality Check

Within months of Muizzu’s election, Maldives faced severe debt burdens—owing over US $1.3 billion to China and $124 million to India—and reached the brink of economic default (Reuters).

2.3 Strategic U‑Turn

By mid‑2024, Muizzu began softening rhetoric: requesting Indian defense platforms back, renewing hydrography cooperation with India, and ultimately inviting PM Modi to visit in July 2025 (Reddit).

2.4 Modi’s Diplomacy and Financial Aid

In late July 2025, Modi visited the Maldives as the Guest of Honour for its 60th Independence celebrations. He extended a $565 million line of credit, initiated FTA negotiations, and reinforced India’s role as Maldives’ trusted partner (AP News).


3. Maldives: Never in India’s Basket to Begin With

3.1 Historical Ambivalence

Though India helped during the 1988 coup (Operation Cactus), political sentiment in Maldives has often swung between pro‑India and pro‑China factions. Strong historical ties never translated into absolute dependence (Wikipedia).

3.2 Sovereignty and Domestic Nationalism

Many Maldivians viewed Indian military or diplomatic influence with suspicion. Nationalist leaders repeatedly used the “India Out” theme as a political tool to appeal to domestic opinion (ISAS).

3.3 Debt‑Diplomacy Limits

China’s deep involvement in Maldives infrastructure created long‑term debt issues that eventually pushed the nation to recalibrate toward India for liquidity and economic support, undermining the narrative that Maldives was firmly in China’s basket either (Wikipedia, ThePrint, Reddit).


4. String of Pearls: Is It Now Failing?

4.1 Overview of String of Pearls

China’s String of Pearls refers to a network of ports and facilities in Gwadar (Pakistan), Hambantota (Sri Lanka), Sittwe (Myanmar), Chittagong (Bangladesh), Maldives, and Djibouti—all viewed as strategic encirclement of India (Reddit).

4.2 Pushback by Local States

Countries involved—Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Maldives—have increasingly resisted full subservience to Chinese debt diplomacy. The Hambantota example in Sri Lanka sparked domestic backlash and eventual Chinese loss of equity control (Wikipedia, ThePrint).

4.3 India’s Counter‑Strategy: Double Fish Hook

India’s “Double Fish Hook” maritime strategy—through port development and alliances in Eastern (Andaman & Nicobar to Diego Garcia) and Western Indian Ocean (Oman‑Mauritius‑Seychelles‐Madagascar)—aims to disrupt China’s string-like encirclement (Wikipedia).

4.4 Economic Sustainability Questioned

Many of the Chinese investments have become non‑performing assets, burdened with debt to GDP ratios that Maldives and Sri Lanka cannot sustain. Local discontent over economic sovereignty has made the String of Pearls approach less effective than intended (Wikipedia, ThePrint, Reddit).


5. Current Scenario: India Reasserts Itself

5.1 Diplomatic Thaw

India’s recent diplomacy has pivoted Maldives back into its sphere—not by force, but through lines of credit, debt relief (40% payment reduction), free trade discussions, infrastructure investment, and soft “masala” diplomacy (The Economic Times).

5.2 Strategic Relevance

India’s naval exercises across African and IOR partners highlight its intent to assert regional maritime leadership. Events like joint drills with African nations reinforce India’s stake in pushing back against Chinese influence (ft.com).

5.3 Maldives Pivoting

Muizzu’s government has publicly praised Modi, calling him a “wonderful person,” and appears to be warming toward India amid its economic challenges—marking a reverse of his earlier anti‑India stance (Reddit).


6. Key Takeaways

  • China’s India‑Out Campaign failed because Maldives couldn’t sustain pro‑China rhetoric amid mounting Chinese debt and economic crisis.

  • Maldives was never fully in India’s basket—local politics and sovereign nationalism have always tempered deeper integration.

  • String of Pearls is faltering—debt, political backlash, and emerging alternatives have weakened the effectiveness of China’s encirclement strategy.

  • India’s soft power, financial tools, and maritime strategy are making it the more resilient partner in the Indian Ocean region.


7. Implications for the Future

7.1 Geopolitical Lessons

  • Small island states like Maldives have agency—they pivot only as far as economics and sovereignty permit.

  • Big‑power rivalry creates openings, but domestic costs often curtail long‑term alignment.

7.2 For India

  • Investing in renewable infrastructure, trade, capacity building, and security partnerships (e.g. hydrography, surveillance) builds durable influence.

  • Combining diplomacy, credit lines, and regional security frameworks counters China without direct confrontation.

7.3 For China

  • Backlash against heavy debt diplomacy and sovereignty infringements suggests limitations to its String of Pearls model.

  • Overreliance on loan‑driven influence raises reputational risks—especially when debt becomes unsustainable.


Conclusion

The Maldives story is instructive: China’s “India‑Out” gambit backfired, and the nation never truly belonged in India’s strategic control either. Meanwhile, String of Pearls is unraveling under the weight of debt, political pushback, and India’s counter‑strategies. Today, India holds the upper hand through economic support, soft diplomacy, regional influence, and being seen as a legitimate partner—not a hegemonic presence.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Brain-Damaging Tapeworm Infections on the Rise in Mumbai This Monsoon | Seizures and Headaches Among Key Symptoms

Brain-Damaging Tapeworm Infections on the Rise in Mumbai This Monsoon | Seizures and Headaches Among Key Symptoms 🧠 A Hidden Parasite Threat: Tapeworm Infections Damaging Brains in Monsoon-Hit Mumbai As the rainy season drenches the city of Mumbai, a far more insidious danger lurks beneath the puddles and clogged drains: brain-damaging tapeworm infections. A rising number of people are being hospitalized with neurological symptoms such as seizures, persistent headaches, and even confusion—and the cause is far more dangerous than many realize. Medical experts have traced this concerning outbreak to neurocysticercosis , a parasitic infection caused by the larval form of the pork tapeworm, Taenia solium . With Mumbai's sanitation system overwhelmed by monsoon rains, the risk of transmission has significantly escalated, making this an urgent public health concern that is now catching global attention. 🚨 What Is Neurocysticercosis? Neurocysticercosis is an infection of the cen...

🇮🇳 चीन पीछे छूटा! भारत बनी दुनिया की तीसरी सबसे ताकतवर एयरफोर्स – जानें पूरी रिपोर्ट

 🇮🇳 चीन पीछे छूटा… अमेरिका-रूस के बाद भारत के पास है दुनिया की सबसे ताकतवर एयरफोर्स, पाकिस्तान टॉप-10 में भी नहीं 🌍 WDMMA की रिपोर्ट में भारत को तीसरा स्थान विश्व की वायु सेनाओं की ताकत का आकलन करने वाली संस्था World Directory of Modern Military Aircraft (WDMMA) ने हाल ही में अपनी 2025 की रिपोर्ट जारी की है। इस रिपोर्ट के अनुसार — पहले स्थान पर अमेरिका , दूसरे पर रूस , और तीसरे स्थान पर भारत की वायुसेना (Indian Air Force) है। चीन, जिसे अब तक भारत से आगे माना जाता था, इस बार चौथे स्थान पर खिसक गया है। रिपोर्ट में बताया गया है कि भारतीय वायुसेना (IAF) का TruVal Rating स्कोर 69.4 रहा, जबकि चीन की PLAAF (People’s Liberation Army Air Force) को 63.8 अंक मिले। 🇨🇳 चीनी विशेषज्ञ ने दी सफाई – “कागज़ी ताकत असली नहीं होती” इस रैंकिंग के बाद चीन में हलचल मच गई। चीनी सैन्य मामलों के विशेषज्ञ झांग जुनशे (Zhang Junshe) ने बयान दिया कि — “सिर्फ कागज़ों पर दिखने वाली ताकत असली क्षमता नहीं होती, असली ताकत युद्धक्षेत्र में प्रदर्शन से साबित होती है।” उनका कहना है ...

India Tightens Drug Price Oversight in 2025: NPPA Targets Overpriced Non-Scheduled Medicines | Pharma Firms Under Scanner

 🎯 Government Tightens Oversight of Non‑Scheduled Drugs 1. What Changed? Non‑scheduled drugs —those not under DPCO price caps—have historically allowed up to 10% annual price increase by manufacturers ( The Indian Express ). Although not regulated like essential or life‑saving medicines, the National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (NPPA) can still monitor these prices and intervene if firms exceed that 10% limit or demonstrate unreasonable hikes ( GLI ). 2. Why the Policy Tightening? New scrutiny has emerged after the Parliamentary Standing Committee flagged 307 violations as of March 6, 2025, involving non‑scheduled drug manufacturers who exceeded the legally permissible increase on maximum retail price (MRP) ( Medical Dialogues ). This prompted the government to clarify and reinforce enforcement mechanisms , scrutinizing pricing behavior of non-scheduled drug companies more closely. 🚨 What Enforcement Looks Like NPPA now tracks MRP trajectories of n...